Archive | Classical Apologetics RSS feed for this archive

THE REASONABLENESS OF THEISM (CIRCA 1958)

By comparing the evidences for and against Deity it is clear that while neither side is provided absolute proof, the atheistic view requires considerably more faith than the theis­tic view.

TRILLIONS OF LIVING CELLS SPEAK THEIR MESSAGE (C. 1958)

An Organizer of the universe is necessary to the creation of a cell—and to the minds of reasoning men search­ing for a first cause.

FOOTSTEPS OF GOD IN THE PLANT WORLD (C. 1958)

The Divinely artistic beauty of plants—stems,leaves and flowers—greatly exceeds that which the greatest genius among men has produced.

SCIENTIFIC REVELATIONS POINT TO A GOD (C. 1958)

The higher the evolutionary developments to which a creation leads, the stronger the evidence of a supreme intelligence behind that creation.

NATURE’S COMPLEXITY AND GOD (C. 1958)

Man also should be very hesitant to try to improve Nature’s balances—he will find that his human intelligence is no match for that of Nature’s God.

PLAIN WATER WILL TELL YOU THE STORY (C. 1958)

Water has many properties which are in­teresting and which taken together are strong evi­dence of intelligent design.

PHYSICAL EVIDENCES OF GOD (C. 1958)

A little philosophy inclines man to atheism; a depth of philosophy brings him to religion.

APPLYING THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD (C. 1958)

The professional scientist has one special advantage over others, if he will but use it, in understanding the reality of God.

THE INESCAPABLE CONCLUSION (c. 1958)

If you think strongly enough, you will be forced by science to believe in God.

A CONCLUSIVE TEST [c. 1958]

We must be pre­pared to deal seriously with the concept that that God is capable of revealing to us information concerning reality beyond our physical universe.

A THEOLOGIAN ADDRESSES A CONFERENCE OF NUCLEAR RESEARCHERS …

Scientists who are Christians, unite!

VIDEO VAULT (1989) – DR. JOHN GERSTNER: SURE, I’M MORE THAN WILLING TO LET MY ATHEIST OPPONENT MAKE A FOOL OF HIMSELF IN THIS DEBATE …

The Enlightenment’s way of thinking is to always argue the negative … even if you are made a fool in the process